The Presidential candidate of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) in the 2023 elections, Atiku Abubakar has described the report by the Economist Intelligence Unit as an embarrassment to the think tank body.
Atiku in a statement issued sunday by his Media Adviser, Paul Ibe, said it was obvious the report that was a merchant purchased by the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC) to confuse the country in an uphill task to defend the sham election of February 25, which only retained the ruling party in office.
The former Vice President said: “We have taken a careful study of the report by the Economist Intelligence Unit, and we regret to say that the report is an embarrassment to the think tank body.
“Notwithstanding the preponderance of salient issues raised on the credibility of the so-called election by local and foreign observers, it is disappointing that the EIU would condescend to ballot laundering for the ruling party in the most populous Black country
“The APC is going cap in hand begging for legitimacy at all impossible places. We wish to remind them of a popular local proverb that: “he who steals a drum from the palace carries the unenviable burden of where to beat it.”
Atiku said he wished to express his intention to apply cautious restraint in responding to the EIU on this disgraceful outing, saying the body should considered this a stern warning to respect Nigeria’s democracy and the institution of the judiciary.
He said next time, the body should be more circumspect before jumping on any trade by barter jaundiced reports about Nigeria.
Atiku added: “A government that goes around to buy anything at sight to award legitimacy unto itself leaves much to the imagination of the people.
“President Tinubu and his team of lawyers had all the opportunity at the court to present his case of legitimacy before the parties closed their cases at the election petition tribunal. But rather than explore that opportunity, his lawyers were busy signing counter motions on subpoenas that seek to shed more light on his personal information.”
“We therefore consider it a breach of due process anything that is being done outside the walls of the court that seeks to make short circuited testimony about the outcome of the Presidential Election Petition Tribunal.”
